Contest!   |   Log in   |   Sign Up   |   Take a Tour


Open a Case
 
Open case
Open a Case
Member Login
Banner
Related

Closed Case
Fire: Women First?
Chigurh
VS
Shopgirl Chigurh: if we are all equal men and women should leave a fire at the same time...

Case Closed on
September 08, 2007 13:14
Closed Case
White and Nerdy vs. Ridin Dirty
TheWrangler
VS
Shopgirl TheWrangler: White and Nerdy is the better song...

Case Closed on
September 18, 2007 19:44
Closed Case
The Love Showdown: Flavor of Love v. Rock of Love
Conspiracy7
VS
Epicurus
Epicurus: flavor flav is the man, flavor of love is definitely the better show!

Case Closed on
August 20, 2007 16:27
Closed Case
Gladiator: A Poor Action Flick or Masterful Drama
Shopgirl
VS
ShadyMcLoven
Shopgirl: Gladiator is both lame and ridiculous...

Case Closed on
October 26, 2007 05:48
Closed Case
Mike Vick and the Dog Fighting Case
Jimbo
VS
Epicurus
Epicurus: Vick should go to jail for a long time, a long long time!

Case Closed on
September 15, 2007 15:11
Judgment
   
The Wall

friends in marriage
Hmnic
    Hmnic: I am not so sure about my husband being friends with a woman he used to date. She is needy and has no friends.

Time remaining
June 01, 2017 00:47
Bye bye PS4
Theempress55445
    Theempress55445: Whatever my husband does to me or the kids, I'm doing it right back to him.

Time remaining
June 02, 2017 11:25
Thanksgiving Craziness
Dingleberry
VS
Murphy Murphy: You have every right to be upset.

Time remaining
June 09, 2017 09:38
THE BRCA GENE AND PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMIES
Shopgirl`s Argument
Shopgirl
Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against shopgirl
So in last sundays ny times was an article about a 33 year old women undergoing a prophylactic mastecotmy to reduce the risk of her developing breas cancer. Note she is cancer free, but after testing positive for the BRCA gene, a mutation that greatly increases a womens risk of developing breast cancer (and ovarian cancer) the women decided to take the preventative step and get her breasts removed. Obviously this is a major life decision. Opting to undergo serious surgery to prevent a disease that may never materialize is a step not carelessly taken. However, I feel that the greatly increased risk of developing the cancer is enough of a reason to opt for the mastectomy.

Epicurus`s Argument
Epicurus

Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against epicurus
This decision is a life altering one and should be weighed heavily before being made. I would like to lay out some reasons why a person would decide not to get a mastectomy to show that it is not a necessary procedure just because you test positive for the BRCA gene.
1. while existence of the gene increases risk, it does not mean all carriers will get the cancer. You still have chance of not developing the disease.
2. frequent testing and observation can catch breast cancer in its earlier stages, and have a great shot at curing it.
3. having a mastectomy means you will not be able to do things that can have serious psychological effects (like losing the ability to breast feed).
What I hope I have shown is that it is not necessary to have a prophylactic mastectomy just because you test positive for the BRCA gene...

Case Information
Views: 990

Rating 5.00 (1 total):
80% of People thought Epicurus was Wrong (5 total votes)
Category Health & Medicine
Case was closed on October 11, 2007 18:38
Tags: BRCA, breast cancer, ny times, ovarian cancer, cancer
URL:  Copy to Clipboard

Save to Favorites Save to Favorites    Flag as Inappropriate Flag as Inappropriate    Send to Friend Send to Friend

Did you enjoy this case? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Spurl! Wists! Simpy! Newsvine! Blinklist! Furl! Fark! Blogmarks! Yahoo! Smarking!
Socialmarker
 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Would you like to comment?
Join Us for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.