Contest!   |   Log in   |   Sign Up   |   Take a Tour


Open a Case
 
Open case
Open a Case
Member Login
Banner
Related

Closed Case
The Love Showdown: Flavor of Love v. Rock of Love
Conspiracy7
VS
Epicurus
Epicurus: flavor flav is the man, flavor of love is definitely the better show!

Case Closed on
August 20, 2007 16:27
Closed Case
Fire: Women First?
Chigurh
VS
Shopgirl Shopgirl: its called being a gentlemen, ladies first, ALWAYS!

Case Closed on
September 08, 2007 13:14
Closed Case
Mike Vick and the Dog Fighting Case
Jimbo
VS
Epicurus
Epicurus: Vick should go to jail for a long time, a long long time!

Case Closed on
September 15, 2007 15:11
Closed Case
Barry Bonds and the hr* title
Epicurus

VS
Dagman Epicurus: Bonds is a cheater and deserves nothing!

Case Closed on
August 09, 2007 02:43
Closed Case
Comedy Rock Duo Battle: Flight of the Conchords vs. Tenacious D
TheWrangler

VS
Epicurus TheWrangler: Flight of the conchords wins the battle outright!

Case Closed on
August 26, 2007 10:48
Judgment
   
The Wall

porn sucks
Amladeus
    Amladeus: why porn is evil and kills love

Time remaining
August 11, 2017 13:53
THE BRCA GENE AND PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMIES
Shopgirl`s Argument
Shopgirl
Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against shopgirl
So in last sundays ny times was an article about a 33 year old women undergoing a prophylactic mastecotmy to reduce the risk of her developing breas cancer. Note she is cancer free, but after testing positive for the BRCA gene, a mutation that greatly increases a womens risk of developing breast cancer (and ovarian cancer) the women decided to take the preventative step and get her breasts removed. Obviously this is a major life decision. Opting to undergo serious surgery to prevent a disease that may never materialize is a step not carelessly taken. However, I feel that the greatly increased risk of developing the cancer is enough of a reason to opt for the mastectomy.

Epicurus`s Argument
Epicurus

Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against epicurus
This decision is a life altering one and should be weighed heavily before being made. I would like to lay out some reasons why a person would decide not to get a mastectomy to show that it is not a necessary procedure just because you test positive for the BRCA gene.
1. while existence of the gene increases risk, it does not mean all carriers will get the cancer. You still have chance of not developing the disease.
2. frequent testing and observation can catch breast cancer in its earlier stages, and have a great shot at curing it.
3. having a mastectomy means you will not be able to do things that can have serious psychological effects (like losing the ability to breast feed).
What I hope I have shown is that it is not necessary to have a prophylactic mastectomy just because you test positive for the BRCA gene...

Case Information
Views: 1010

Rating 5.00 (1 total):
80% of People thought Epicurus was Wrong (5 total votes)
Category Health & Medicine
Case was closed on October 11, 2007 18:38
Tags: BRCA, breast cancer, ny times, ovarian cancer, cancer
URL:  Copy to Clipboard

Save to Favorites Save to Favorites    Flag as Inappropriate Flag as Inappropriate    Send to Friend Send to Friend

Did you enjoy this case? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Spurl! Wists! Simpy! Newsvine! Blinklist! Furl! Fark! Blogmarks! Yahoo! Smarking!
Socialmarker
 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Would you like to comment?
Join Us for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.