Contest!   |   Log in   |   Sign Up   |   Take a Tour


Open a Case
 
Open case
Open a Case
Member Login
Banner
Related

Closed Case
BestTestorone Filled Commercial
Hollywood
VS
MudBugs MudBugs: Under Armour's Klit Klat commercial has more intensity and is more action packed. Gets me pumped every time.

Case Closed on
December 10, 2007 18:35
Closed Case
Getting mad about not going out after the fact
MudBugs
VS
Marcella
Marcella: Your girlfriend sounds like an immature twit who can't make decisions on her own... You need to grow a pair and tell her that she needs to grow up.

Case Closed on
December 12, 2007 21:45
Pending Case
Purpose of the loan as evidence of loan amount and terms?
MudBugs
VS
Argue this Case MudBugs: You must consider the reason for the loan and the context of the conversation. Here It is clear that I meant $200 to gamble and $100 if we loose.

Posted to the Wall on
February 20, 2018 22:15
Closed Case
Can you scare a chicken/turkey to death?
Hollywood
VS
MudBugs
Hollywood: Chickens/turkeys have small hearts and if you scare them you can stop their hearts and kill them.

Case Closed on
December 02, 2007 22:05
Closed Case
Being Used
Jrnyfn

VS
MudBugs MudBugs: Cry me a river....this is your mother, you should do whatever it takes, even if your siblings are short changing you

Case Closed on
December 02, 2007 21:49
Judgment
   
The Wall

THE NEW YORK TIMES HAS NO BUSINESS BACKING ANY CANDIDATE
MudBugs`s Argument
MudBugs
Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against MudBugs
Recently the new york times editorial board announced that it would be backing Hillary Clinton and John McCain in the 2008 presidential race. It seems completely out of place for a supposedly unbiased newspaper to take a stance of this kind. A newspaper should simply present the platforms that each candidate is running on and then let the readers of the newspaper form their own opinion.

But then again presenting the news without trying to push its views on its readers just wouldn't be the New York Times. I can not remember the last time I read a story that was not completely one sided and filled with bias.

Maybe that is why the New York Times is written at the reading level of an elementary school child. An audience that would buy such a newspaper is likely to be easily persuaded and manipulated.

Case Information
Views: 2555 Category Politics
Time started: 3676 days 5 hours 1 min.
Tags:
URL:  Copy to Clipboard

Save to Favorites Save to Favorites    Flag as Inappropriate Flag as Inappropriate    Send to Friend Send to Friend

Did you enjoy this case? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Spurl! Wists! Simpy! Newsvine! Blinklist! Furl! Fark! Blogmarks! Yahoo! Smarking!
Socialmarker
 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
BybeeMatt   2076 days 12 hours ago
You are incorrect. Papers have editorial boards, the opinions they voice inform the public - not just of the opinions of some of the most informed people, but also of the bias of the paper. There's no such thing as unbiased news, just news sources that try to hide their bias. And anyway, papers endorsing candidates is sort of an old tradition.

Would you like to comment?
Join Us for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.