Contest!   |   Log in   |   Sign Up   |   Take a Tour


Open a Case
 
Open case
Open a Case
Member Login
Banner
Related

Pending Case
Purpose of the loan as evidence of loan amount and terms?
MudBugs
VS
Argue this Case MudBugs: You must consider the reason for the loan and the context of the conversation. Here It is clear that I meant $200 to gamble and $100 if we loose.

Posted to the Wall on
March 26, 2017 19:45
Closed Case
BestTestorone Filled Commercial
Hollywood
VS
MudBugs Hollywood: The Nike, "leave nothing" commercial can make even the most feminine of girls want to lift weights or trample somebody.

Case Closed on
December 10, 2007 18:35
Closed Case
Offer to Pay?
LawGirl
VS
MudBugs
LawGirl: Should a woman offer to pay for dinner? If she doesnt would you be offended? And, if you happen to be offended, would you tell her?!!

Case Closed on
December 11, 2007 21:29
Closed Case
Choosing a Stall
MudBugs
VS
Larlarlarz Larlarlarz: That's life, we all urinate and it's natural.

Case Closed on
November 28, 2016 19:20
Closed Case
Getting mad about not going out after the fact
MudBugs
VS
Marcella
Marcella: Your girlfriend sounds like an immature twit who can't make decisions on her own... You need to grow a pair and tell her that she needs to grow up.

Case Closed on
December 12, 2007 21:45
Judgment
   
The Wall

Me vs. her Sister
JBroken
    JBroken: I can't support their dominance over her.

Time remaining
March 31, 2017 04:47
Stuck in the Middle
Kalnise
    Kalnise: I wake up to an argument that one friend has taken way out of proportion,

Time remaining
March 31, 2017 13:34
THE NEW YORK TIMES HAS NO BUSINESS BACKING ANY CANDIDATE
MudBugs`s Argument
MudBugs
Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against MudBugs
Recently the new york times editorial board announced that it would be backing Hillary Clinton and John McCain in the 2008 presidential race. It seems completely out of place for a supposedly unbiased newspaper to take a stance of this kind. A newspaper should simply present the platforms that each candidate is running on and then let the readers of the newspaper form their own opinion.

But then again presenting the news without trying to push its views on its readers just wouldn't be the New York Times. I can not remember the last time I read a story that was not completely one sided and filled with bias.

Maybe that is why the New York Times is written at the reading level of an elementary school child. An audience that would buy such a newspaper is likely to be easily persuaded and manipulated.

Case Information
Views: 2241 Category Politics
Time started: 3345 days 2 hours 30 min.
Tags:
URL:  Copy to Clipboard

Save to Favorites Save to Favorites    Flag as Inappropriate Flag as Inappropriate    Send to Friend Send to Friend

Did you enjoy this case? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Spurl! Wists! Simpy! Newsvine! Blinklist! Furl! Fark! Blogmarks! Yahoo! Smarking!
Socialmarker
 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
BybeeMatt   1745 days 9 hours 30 min. ago
You are incorrect. Papers have editorial boards, the opinions they voice inform the public - not just of the opinions of some of the most informed people, but also of the bias of the paper. There's no such thing as unbiased news, just news sources that try to hide their bias. And anyway, papers endorsing candidates is sort of an old tradition.

Would you like to comment?
Join Us for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.