Contest!   |   Log in   |   Sign Up   |   Take a Tour


Open a Case
 
Open case
Open a Case
Member Login
Banner
Related

Closed Case
Offer to Pay?
LawGirl
VS
MudBugs
LawGirl: Should a woman offer to pay for dinner? If she doesnt would you be offended? And, if you happen to be offended, would you tell her?!!

Case Closed on
December 11, 2007 21:29
Closed Case
BestTestorone Filled Commercial
Hollywood
VS
MudBugs MudBugs: Under Armour's Klit Klat commercial has more intensity and is more action packed. Gets me pumped every time.

Case Closed on
December 10, 2007 18:35
Pending Case
Purpose of the loan as evidence of loan amount and terms?
MudBugs
VS
Argue this Case MudBugs: You must consider the reason for the loan and the context of the conversation. Here It is clear that I meant $200 to gamble and $100 if we loose.

Posted to the Wall on
June 26, 2017 20:49
Closed Case
Being Used
Jrnyfn

VS
MudBugs Jrnyfn: Taking Mother everywhere when I have three sibilings

Case Closed on
December 02, 2007 21:49
Closed Case
Choosing a Stall
MudBugs
VS
Larlarlarz MudBugs: When possible one should always avoid sitting in a stall next to an already occupied stall.

Case Closed on
November 28, 2016 19:20
Judgment
   
The Wall

Relationship Difficulties
ImPissed
    ImPissed: I want to have sex with my boyfriend, but he's Catholic and is against sex before marriage. I'm a virgin and I want to share my first time with him.

Time remaining
July 07, 2017 23:07
THE NEW YORK TIMES HAS NO BUSINESS BACKING ANY CANDIDATE
MudBugs`s Argument
MudBugs
Send a message    Add to My Friends    Open a case against MudBugs
Recently the new york times editorial board announced that it would be backing Hillary Clinton and John McCain in the 2008 presidential race. It seems completely out of place for a supposedly unbiased newspaper to take a stance of this kind. A newspaper should simply present the platforms that each candidate is running on and then let the readers of the newspaper form their own opinion.

But then again presenting the news without trying to push its views on its readers just wouldn't be the New York Times. I can not remember the last time I read a story that was not completely one sided and filled with bias.

Maybe that is why the New York Times is written at the reading level of an elementary school child. An audience that would buy such a newspaper is likely to be easily persuaded and manipulated.

Case Information
Views: 2345 Category Politics
Time started: 3437 days 3 hours 34 min.
Tags:
URL:  Copy to Clipboard

Save to Favorites Save to Favorites    Flag as Inappropriate Flag as Inappropriate    Send to Friend Send to Friend

Did you enjoy this case? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Spurl! Wists! Simpy! Newsvine! Blinklist! Furl! Fark! Blogmarks! Yahoo! Smarking!
Socialmarker
 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
BybeeMatt   1837 days 10 hours 34 min. ago
You are incorrect. Papers have editorial boards, the opinions they voice inform the public - not just of the opinions of some of the most informed people, but also of the bias of the paper. There's no such thing as unbiased news, just news sources that try to hide their bias. And anyway, papers endorsing candidates is sort of an old tradition.

Would you like to comment?
Join Us for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.