Open case
Member Login
Banner
Related
Closed Case
Better Beatles Song
 | VS |  |
TheDrago: "Norwegian Wood" is one of my favorites
Case Closed on September 08, 2007 16:47 |
Closed Case
The BRCA gene and Prophylactic Mastectomies
 | VS | |
Shopgirl: a women who tests positive for the BRCA gene should get a mastectomy, hands down, better safe than sorry!
Case Closed on October 11, 2007 18:38 |
Closed Case
How many hits does it take to smash a head?
| VS | |
Leftwing7: no ones head can be smashed to mush with 4 knocks of a rock
Case Closed on August 26, 2007 18:28 |
Closed Case
Marc Ecko and the Fate of the HR title ball
| VS |  |
Conspiracy7: put an asterick on it and send it to the hall of fame!
Case Closed on October 06, 2007 18:13 |
Closed Case
The Yuletide Log
| VS |  |
Dagman: the yuletide log refers to a traditional desert that is served on christmas
Case Closed on January 11, 2008 21:31 |
JOHN VS. PAUL
Leftwing7`s Argument
|
Not even a comparison. John is in a different, and much higher category than Paul. Without even talking about the pure lameness of Paul, Johns music ability and track record far surpass that of Paul. Above everything else he is just cooler, heck he's the bloody walrus! |
Shopgirl`s Argument
|
|
I am a huge beatle fan, but I get upset when Paul McCartney doesn't the recognition that he deserves. John Lennon is often made out to be this god for reasons that are unknown to me. Yes, John Lennon was an amazing musician, but I feel that we have built up to a status that he does not necessarily deserve. Lets take a look at why Paul matches AND surpasses John. To start if we take a look at the best beatles song it has to be Yesterday, written by Paul. Furthermore, Paul has had his fair share of lady troubles, but I think we can agree that Yoko Ono is the worst thing that ever happened to the beatles. Beyond that the music put out by Paul (in fact still being put out) after the beatles with wings and on solo albums is much better than those completed by John. Take a look at the evidence below and see if you agree with me. VOTE FOR PAUL! |
Case Information
|
Views: 1185 Rating 4.50 (4 total): 
|
64% of People thought Leftwing7 was Wrong (11 total votes) Category Miscellaneous Case was closed on August 10, 2007 14:33 Tags: the beatles, music, john lennon, paul mccartney URL: Copy to Clipboard  Save to Favorites
 Flag as Inappropriate
 Send to Friend
Did you enjoy this case? Please bookmark it onto: 
|
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
markisb62
1645 days 10 hours 30 min. ago
Got to go with shopgirl here. those who believe john was legendary and paul was a talentless stand in, has no knowledge what so ever of the beatles. these 2 were great together. for quite some time john got lazy while paul carried this masterful group. not giving paul his credit, was was genius, is as uneducated as one can be. please go study-up before statements like this are made
lester
1748 days 22 hours 55 min. ago
I was up in the air about this until I got a copy of Mccartney II with the unreleased tracks. This album destroys anything Lennon ever recorded solo.
Waking9985
1749 days 17 hours 34 min. ago
John led a generation. Paul led his own sell-out ass to the bank.
Vote goes to John Winston Lennon.
Vote goes to John Winston Lennon.
hstencil
1749 days 19 hours 12 min. ago
john had to die so "ebony and ivory" could live.
vote goes for john.
vote goes for john.
Chigurh
1750 days 21 hours 16 min. ago
i am the eggman,,,,,, i am the walrus!
exitheuxa
1750 days 23 hours 13 min. ago
paul mccartney is a haggard old man, no dice paul john has you beat
TheDrago
1766 days 20 hours 37 min. ago
John's solo music is way better than Paul's. Besides at least yoko has 2 legs!!!